Tuesday, September 21, 2010
New Jersey Governor Christie Takes on Teacher in Townhall Meeting
This is simply brilliant! First of all the teachers unions are a liberal bunch of whiners, much as this teacher and their "woes" are self-created, just as Governor Christie outlines.
The New Congress Will Consider Impeachment
The New Congress Will Consider Impeachment
In the local newspaper today, the following column appeared written by Floyd and Mary Brown/Cagle Cartoons. I have to say, they speak for me. Please click on link above to read the entire article. At the bottom of the article is a link to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Please take a moment and do so. As Mr. Brown says, our nation depends on it!
NEXT CONGRESS COULD HAVE IMPEACHMENT ON ITS AGENDA
Floyd and Mary Brown
The new Congress elected in November will surprise everyone. They will seriously consider impeaching Barack Obama.
Growing under the radar of the mainstream media is a movement that is gathering momentum.
More than one million citizens have signed petitions calling on the U.S. Congress to impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Some of the soon-to-be-elected members of Congress are amongst those who have signed up, and they are not about to be cowered by establishment Republicans scared silly of the issue.
Ultimately, it comes down to a commonly shared belief amongst Tea Party activists that Barack Obama is systematically trying to hurt America. Obama, the argument goes, is not an incompetent boob in over his head. Nor is he is not some well-meaning community organizer who has seen his plans go astray.
Barack Obama is a dishonest, manipulative liar who actually is pursuing an agenda that he hopes will take America off the international leadership stage. He wants America to fail so that the vision of internationalist socialists can be realized. America is hated by the elite intellectuals of the world because we have been the single biggest roadblock to their plans to establish a one world governing system with them in charge.
Americans has consistently rejected socialism. Whether it is Hillarycare or Obamacare, Americans are speaking with a loud, clear voice against socialism.
The Left hates America because of our belief in God, our belief in rugged individualism, our belief in private property, and our belief in the right to keep and bear arms.
It is only through impeachment that the new Congress can send Barack Obama a clear and unambiguous message that he does not have carte blanche to run roughshod over America.
Impeachment is the political tool given by the Founders to correct abuse by a president. Impeachment is often misunderstood because of confusion about what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense.
Former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.”
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English common law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age.
“High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior.
Here’s a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution:
“High crimes and misdemeanors” entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other “great and dangerous offenses” might not be covered… so Mason then proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a “misdemeanor” meant “mis-demeanor,” or bad behavior.
In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a criminal act, as some would lead you to believe. Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which are gross incompetence, gross negligence, outright distasteful, or in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show “malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.”
And for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting president be a political act.
The Founding Fathers deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment.
The Obama administration qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior.
Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history.
Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this.
In the local newspaper today, the following column appeared written by Floyd and Mary Brown/Cagle Cartoons. I have to say, they speak for me. Please click on link above to read the entire article. At the bottom of the article is a link to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Please take a moment and do so. As Mr. Brown says, our nation depends on it!
NEXT CONGRESS COULD HAVE IMPEACHMENT ON ITS AGENDA
Floyd and Mary Brown
The new Congress elected in November will surprise everyone. They will seriously consider impeaching Barack Obama.
Growing under the radar of the mainstream media is a movement that is gathering momentum.
More than one million citizens have signed petitions calling on the U.S. Congress to impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Some of the soon-to-be-elected members of Congress are amongst those who have signed up, and they are not about to be cowered by establishment Republicans scared silly of the issue.
Ultimately, it comes down to a commonly shared belief amongst Tea Party activists that Barack Obama is systematically trying to hurt America. Obama, the argument goes, is not an incompetent boob in over his head. Nor is he is not some well-meaning community organizer who has seen his plans go astray.
Barack Obama is a dishonest, manipulative liar who actually is pursuing an agenda that he hopes will take America off the international leadership stage. He wants America to fail so that the vision of internationalist socialists can be realized. America is hated by the elite intellectuals of the world because we have been the single biggest roadblock to their plans to establish a one world governing system with them in charge.
Americans has consistently rejected socialism. Whether it is Hillarycare or Obamacare, Americans are speaking with a loud, clear voice against socialism.
The Left hates America because of our belief in God, our belief in rugged individualism, our belief in private property, and our belief in the right to keep and bear arms.
It is only through impeachment that the new Congress can send Barack Obama a clear and unambiguous message that he does not have carte blanche to run roughshod over America.
Impeachment is the political tool given by the Founders to correct abuse by a president. Impeachment is often misunderstood because of confusion about what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense.
Former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.”
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English common law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age.
“High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior.
Here’s a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution:
“High crimes and misdemeanors” entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other “great and dangerous offenses” might not be covered… so Mason then proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a “misdemeanor” meant “mis-demeanor,” or bad behavior.
In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a criminal act, as some would lead you to believe. Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which are gross incompetence, gross negligence, outright distasteful, or in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show “malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.”
And for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting president be a political act.
The Founding Fathers deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment.
The Obama administration qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior.
Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history.
Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this.
Pro-Life Women on the Rise by Kathryn Lopez, National Review On line
Pro-Life Women on the Rise
By Kathryn Lopez | September 18th, 2010
Christine O’Donnell was ecstatic on election night. The winner of the Republican primary in Delaware was happy and beaming and passionate — she’s a natural in front of television cameras — as she celebrated her unconventional win. Watching that image, Chris Matthews on “Hardball” announced, “I think she beats out Carly Fiorina in the likeability department.”
I suppose it depends what your meaning of likable is. I like candidates who know who they are and appear completely comfortable in their own political skin. That pretty well describes Fiorina, the Republican nominee for Senate in California.
But Matthews was onto something undeniable. While Fiorina was one of the original “Mamma grizzlies” endorsed by Sarah Palin and the pro-life organization Susan B. Anthony List, the image doesn’t quite seem to fit for the former CEO. She’s not a perky takedown artist from Delaware. She’s not an exotic (to us lower 48ers) lipsticked pit bull from Alaska. She isn’t easily labeled.
Hers is a “a solid, conservative economic message that find common ground with the independent women voters on economic issues for the general election,” as Mercedes Schlapp, mother of four girls, media consultant and veteran of the George W. Bush administration, sees it. And Fiorina also happens to be a pro-life, pro-marriage conservative, running against, three-term incumbent Barbara Boxer, a foremost advocate of legal abortion. But Fiorina doesn’t make those the most prominent aspects of her campaign. She simply seeks to bring her life experience to the political table in service of the people of California.
“Carly is not running away from her views, but chooses to stay focused on the issues that matter most to voters,” Marty Wilson, her campaign manager, explains. “Because of Carly’s background as a business leader, she is afforded the best of both worlds. Values voters are comforted by her views, and economic conservatives can be assured that she won’t support new taxes and believes the unbridled growth must be halted.”
That dynamic played out in the candidates’ first debate. Sen. Boxer hyperbolically thundered: “If my opponent’s views prevailed (on abortion), women and doctors would be criminals, they would go to jail. Women would die, like they did before Roe v. Wade.” But Fiorina calmly and beautifully explained that her own family life brought her to her position. She added that she recognizes “that not everyone agrees with me on this.” And reminded voters “I recognize as well that the most important issue right now in this election is the creation of jobs and getting our government under control.” She went on, again in response to a question, to defend and explain why she opposes federal funding of embryonic-stem-cell research. Fiorina gave a plug for more promising adults-stem-cell research and didn’t miss the opportunity note that: “Senator Boxer voted against a ban on human cloning.” It’s hard to cast anyone else as extreme, as Boxer has, with that record.
Fiorina used the debate as a teachable moment, not just a battle of sound bites. And it wasn’t just pro-life me who was impressed. A Los Angeles Times review gave her high marks for her grace under fire.
And while Boxer, funded by Planned Parenthood and EMILY’s List (a group that supports female pro-choice politicians and candidates) obviously thinks she can demonize Fiorina on these issues, it’s not clear her strategy will have traction, even in California this year.
“In most polls, the race is a statistical tie,” John J. Pitney Jr., a professor of politics at Claremont McKenna College, observes, calling it “remarkable.” “Though Republicans have sometimes done well in races for state government offices, California has long favored Democrats for federal office. No Republican candidate for president or U.S. Senate has won here since 1988.”
It’s remarkable because Fiorina is being outspent. It’s remarkable because Fiorina is not running left or away from her staunchly held social positions. “Fiorina is doing well because California’s economic woes are causing many voters to question the policies that Barbara Boxer supports,” Pitney surmises.
Fiorina’s strategy resembles Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell’s race in Virginia last year. His opposition tried to paint him as a right-wing Neanderthal. But as far as he was concerned, the race was about jobs, education, and transportation — it’s what Virginia needed in a gubernatorial candidate. McDonnell not only won in the purple commonwealth, he won 51 percent of full-time, outside of the home, working women — even as his opposition insisted on emphasizing and demonizing a graduate paper he wrote on traditional gender roles.
Rest of the article can be read here
By Kathryn Lopez | September 18th, 2010
Christine O’Donnell was ecstatic on election night. The winner of the Republican primary in Delaware was happy and beaming and passionate — she’s a natural in front of television cameras — as she celebrated her unconventional win. Watching that image, Chris Matthews on “Hardball” announced, “I think she beats out Carly Fiorina in the likeability department.”
I suppose it depends what your meaning of likable is. I like candidates who know who they are and appear completely comfortable in their own political skin. That pretty well describes Fiorina, the Republican nominee for Senate in California.
But Matthews was onto something undeniable. While Fiorina was one of the original “Mamma grizzlies” endorsed by Sarah Palin and the pro-life organization Susan B. Anthony List, the image doesn’t quite seem to fit for the former CEO. She’s not a perky takedown artist from Delaware. She’s not an exotic (to us lower 48ers) lipsticked pit bull from Alaska. She isn’t easily labeled.
Hers is a “a solid, conservative economic message that find common ground with the independent women voters on economic issues for the general election,” as Mercedes Schlapp, mother of four girls, media consultant and veteran of the George W. Bush administration, sees it. And Fiorina also happens to be a pro-life, pro-marriage conservative, running against, three-term incumbent Barbara Boxer, a foremost advocate of legal abortion. But Fiorina doesn’t make those the most prominent aspects of her campaign. She simply seeks to bring her life experience to the political table in service of the people of California.
“Carly is not running away from her views, but chooses to stay focused on the issues that matter most to voters,” Marty Wilson, her campaign manager, explains. “Because of Carly’s background as a business leader, she is afforded the best of both worlds. Values voters are comforted by her views, and economic conservatives can be assured that she won’t support new taxes and believes the unbridled growth must be halted.”
That dynamic played out in the candidates’ first debate. Sen. Boxer hyperbolically thundered: “If my opponent’s views prevailed (on abortion), women and doctors would be criminals, they would go to jail. Women would die, like they did before Roe v. Wade.” But Fiorina calmly and beautifully explained that her own family life brought her to her position. She added that she recognizes “that not everyone agrees with me on this.” And reminded voters “I recognize as well that the most important issue right now in this election is the creation of jobs and getting our government under control.” She went on, again in response to a question, to defend and explain why she opposes federal funding of embryonic-stem-cell research. Fiorina gave a plug for more promising adults-stem-cell research and didn’t miss the opportunity note that: “Senator Boxer voted against a ban on human cloning.” It’s hard to cast anyone else as extreme, as Boxer has, with that record.
Fiorina used the debate as a teachable moment, not just a battle of sound bites. And it wasn’t just pro-life me who was impressed. A Los Angeles Times review gave her high marks for her grace under fire.
And while Boxer, funded by Planned Parenthood and EMILY’s List (a group that supports female pro-choice politicians and candidates) obviously thinks she can demonize Fiorina on these issues, it’s not clear her strategy will have traction, even in California this year.
“In most polls, the race is a statistical tie,” John J. Pitney Jr., a professor of politics at Claremont McKenna College, observes, calling it “remarkable.” “Though Republicans have sometimes done well in races for state government offices, California has long favored Democrats for federal office. No Republican candidate for president or U.S. Senate has won here since 1988.”
It’s remarkable because Fiorina is being outspent. It’s remarkable because Fiorina is not running left or away from her staunchly held social positions. “Fiorina is doing well because California’s economic woes are causing many voters to question the policies that Barbara Boxer supports,” Pitney surmises.
Fiorina’s strategy resembles Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell’s race in Virginia last year. His opposition tried to paint him as a right-wing Neanderthal. But as far as he was concerned, the race was about jobs, education, and transportation — it’s what Virginia needed in a gubernatorial candidate. McDonnell not only won in the purple commonwealth, he won 51 percent of full-time, outside of the home, working women — even as his opposition insisted on emphasizing and demonizing a graduate paper he wrote on traditional gender roles.
Rest of the article can be read here
Monday, September 20, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
9/11 and the Pentagon
Often when speaking or hearing about 9/11, only the Twin Towers are mentioned. However, some ways away, innocent Americans were killed as they went about their daily duties at the Pentagon. One of them was Melissa Rose Barnes, the daughter of a dear friend, who I had known since she was a young girl. Melissa was a blessing in her mother's life and in the lives of those who knew her. Devoted to her family, dedicated to her service in the U.S. Navy, she was a sweet and dear girl. I have pictures of her through the years. She would call me once in a while and share the events of her life. Several times, she sent pictures of her home, her pets, her in her uniform performing her duties. In the video here, you can see her picture at 54 seconds. Melissa Rose Barnes, rest in peace. We have not forgotten you.
Friday, September 3, 2010
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
John Cusack calls for "Satanic Death" of Fox News & GOP leaders
I used to like John Cusack, though I learned of he and his sister's extreme liberal leanings years ago and chose to stop watching his movies. I respect his right to free speech; however, calling for the death of someone goes beyond the pale of free speech. I agree that it is this sort of rhetoric that could push an unstable person to do something horrible. Remember when Alec Baldwin made his fist-pounding statement that Henry Hyde should be stoned to death during the Clinton impeachment hearings? I remember.
John Cusack Calls for 'Satanic Death' of Fox News, GOP Leaders
By Jo Piazza
Published August 31, 2010 | FoxNews.com
fox news
Actor John Cusack went on a caustic Twitter rampage Sunday evening, attacking former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Fox News.
“I AM FOR A SATANIC DEATH CULT CENTER AT FOX NEWS HQ AND OUTSIDE THE OFFICES ORDICK ARMEYAND NEWT GINGRICH-and all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS,” Cusack tweeted.
Cusack has long been outspoken about politics. He supported Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election and has contributed to The Huffington Post, but this is the first known time he has stooped to the level of making threats.
And while the U.S. Constitution protects Cusack's right to speak his mind, some critics say he should be more careful about what he says, since he has more than 200,000 Twitter followers.
“His provocative tweets could easily incite a rabid fan to commit violent acts against Fox News Headquarters and others he names," said Dr. Carole Lieberman, a Beverly Hills-based psychiatrist and author of "Coping With Terrorism: Dreams Interrupted."
"Fans could not only be influenced because of their devotion to Cusack, the man, but also because of their love for one of the characters he plays,” she told Fox411.
Cooper Lawrence, the author of “Cult of Celebrity” told Fox 411: “The fear isn't that a celebrity will influence someone to do something violent or out of character due to the sheer devotion to the celebrity, the fear is that someone who is already vulnerable, mentally disturbed, already considering something dangerous, may be encouraged to do so if it is advocated by their favorite star,”
Lawrence explained that while celebrities don't make healthy people do things they wouldn't normally do, they could impact someone who is on the fence or mentally unstable.
“John Cusack has to know that his words carry weight because he is an actor beloved by many generations of folks who may not get his humor and might think he is calling for something more sinister. The responsibility is on him to not abuse his fame to influence something negative on the off chance that even one person takes his words to heart,” Lawrence said.
Cusack could also be doing his career some damage. Image consultant Michael Sands says that Cusack should be worried that his vituperative words could turn off some of his fans.
The remainder of the article can be read here
Obama press secretary Gibbs refuses to answer if Obama will credit Bush for surge in upcoming speech
From this video we can gather that Gibbs can count...and that what he is truly counting is the number of times he refuses to answer the question. I like Gretchen's "cute" comment at the end though.
The Lunacy of the Far Left from Huffington Post
Following the Restoring Honor gathering in Washington, Beau Friedlander published this at HuffPo. Note how he thinks the Mormons reverance for women is sickening but never mentions the treatment of Muslim women under Sharia.
Glenn Beck responds!
The above is courtesy of ResistNet.com which may be accessed here
Huffington Poster Offers $100,000 for Nonexistent Glenn Beck Sex Tape
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
Mon, 08/30/2010 - 10:19 ET
CRITICAL UPDATES AT END OF ARTICLE: HuffPo pulls piece, Beck responds.
A Huffington Post contributor and former editor of the failed liberal radio network Air America is offering $100,000 for a nonexistent sex tape featuring Glenn Beck.
"Rupert Murdoch and the Koch brothers are happy to throw money at the rising tide of right wing lunacy," wrote Beau Friedlander at HuffPo Monday.
"Breitbart offered $100,000 for JournoList, the email listserve that brought down WaPo blogger Dave Weigel this June," he continued.
"Why did they do it?" he asked.
His answer was as offensive as his despicable offer (h/t @MelissaTweets aka Melissa Clouthier):
Because they stand to make a lot of money off the anti-black president movement, and they are rich enough to imprint their beliefs on the American sheeple.
The bio for this miscreant reads:
Beau Friedlander is a writer living in Brooklyn. He was the editor-in-chief of Air America until it closed in 2010, and is the former publisher of Context Books, an award-winning small press.
He is currently working on a book proposal called The Bunker Mentality, which takes on the conservative movement with lessons learned from his time at Air America, and as the publisher of War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You To Know by former UNSCOM inspector Scott Ritter and William Rivers Pitt.
His work can be found in the Los Angeles Times, The Paris Review, and other publications.
His piece predictably went after "Tea Baggers":
In cultural terms, the original neoconservatives who birthed the baggers were way more frightened by the Broadway musical "Hair" than the film "Rosemary's Baby" (both from 1968). A mock ad might go like this: "Afraid your daughter might hook up with a black guy (or the nation may choose one to be president)? Have a problem with that h***sexual and or promiscuous son or daughter? Does your son need a haircut? Do you often find biblical characters charred into your toast? Then do we have the movement for you!"
Then, to the typical liberal attack on Beck:
Glenn Beck is also a Mormon. It matters. His religion typifies the noble lie that the neocons originally set out to defend against the counterculture--Archie Bunker's America--where a woman's place was in the home and with baby, and an African American's place was in a ghetto. (Mormons revere women much like Hindis do the cow, and they didn't accept African Americans in their ranks at all till 1978--draw whatever inferences you like). [...]
It is time to pop the tea baggers' favorite balloon (so what if it will be replaced by another?), and with that in mind I hereby offer to negotiate a $100,000 payday to the person who will come forward with a sex tape or phone records or anything else that succeeds in removing Glenn Beck from the public eye forever. I am not offering the cash myself, but I will broker the deal and/or raise the money for what you bring to the table. (And it better be good.)
If you have the goods, or if you want to contribute to a slush fund to buy more takedowns (probably not tax deductible), please contact me at: glennbecksextape@gmail.com
Glenn Beck responds!
The above is courtesy of ResistNet.com which may be accessed here
Restoring Honor August 28, 2010
Enjoy this great slideshow from Restoring Honor gathering. Enjoy it here because the MSM refused to even cover it, other than to point out repeatedly that it was a mainly "white" event. Sickening.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
THIS BLOG IS ON VACATION - BE BACK SOON
Feel free to read through the old posts. This is a conservative prolife blog.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Anti-Semitism in the United States - UC Irvine
More sharia at UC-Irvine, 12 arrested for disrupting Israeli ambassador
Campus jihad continues. From the Orange County Register:
Twelve people were arrested this evening during a raucous lecture at UC Irvine where Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren came to talk about U.S.-Israel relations.
Oren was interrupted 10 times while trying to give his speech before 500 people at the UCI Student Center, where there was heavy security. Oren took a 20 minute break after the fourth protest, asked for hospitality and resumed his speech, only to be interrupted again by young men yelling at him every few minutes. Many members of the audience also applauded Oren.
After the 10th interruption, several dozens students who opposed Oren’s talk got up and walked out and staged a protest outside. It is not clear whether they were members of the UCI Muslim Student Union, which issued an email earlier in the day condemning Oren’s appearance on campus.
From a previous UCI intifada uprising:
“…Our weapon, our jihad, our way of struggling in this country [USA], is our tongue. We speak out, we deflate their [Americans and Jews] morale, and it’s the best we can do right now…and our brothers and sisters on the other side of the world are handling business in their own way.”
More on the Muslim Student union here
Hat tip to Atlas Shrugs and Pam Geller for keeping us informed.
I think the best part of the video was the part near the end where the students walked out and what appeared to be one of their professors was telling them "you have failed all of your exams." I hope it was worth it for them to behave in such a manner. It doesn't look like they will be doing so well in school this semester. David Horowitz, linked above for Discover the Networks, has been writing for years about this very thing. It's one thing to read about it and another to see the actual video.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Maafa 21, Planned Parenthood, Eugenics and Margaret Sanger
They were stolen from their homes, locked in chains and taken across an ocean. And for more than 200 years, their blood and sweat would help to build the richest and most powerful nation the world has ever known.
But when slavery ended, their welcome was over. America's wealthy elite had decided it was time for them to disappear and they were not particular about how it might be done.
What you are about to see is that the plan these people set in motion 150 years ago is still being carried out today. So don't think that this is history. It is not. It is happening right here, and it's happening right now.
Maafa 21- Black Genocide, learn more about this amazing video here
I urge you to visit this site and learn about the real reason Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger. I have written on this blog repeatedly about black genocide in modern day by planned parenthood. Unfortunately, the black community still stands with the liberals who support and fund planned parenthood. I can only believe it is because they have no idea what is happening. As more and more educational films such as this are made, I do believe enlightenment is at hand. I pray that it is.
Pregnancy Centers Get Boost in Oklahoma
Pregnancy Centers Get Boost in OklahomaOklahoma, a solidly conservative state and home of my heart, I love you.
CBS Cites Left-Wing Advocate of Infanticide to Encourage Charitable Giving | NewsBusters.org
CBS Cites Left-Wing Advocate of Infanticide to Encourage Charitable Giving | NewsBusters.org
While Strassmann simply introduced Singer as a bio-ethicist, in reality, the professor has a history of promoting radical ideas, such as justifying infanticide. In an excerpt of his 1993 book Practical Ethics, entitled “Taking Life: Humans,” Singer concluded: “Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all.” CBS certainly picked an odd person to lecture Americans on caring for those less fortunate.
Feminists Still Hand Wringing Over Tebow Ad
Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness," writes:
"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly
identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to
adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs
of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines
about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks
above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own
lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."
Michelle Obama Responds to Sarah Palin's Pokes at President Obama - ABC News
Michelle Obama Responds to Sarah Palin's Pokes at President Obama - ABC NewsI guess Michelle and I have a different definition of phenomenal.
Pam Geller from Atlas Shrugs on the Joy Behar Show
First of all, Ron Reagan is a disgrace to his father's name. He is a smarmy, petulant little man who is coasting on his father's name, all the while disgracing it. His father WOULD have loved Sarah Palin. Him, not so much. Joy Behar is at her shrieking harridan best here and Stephanie Miller as well. I admire Pam for going up against them. They did not fail to disappoint, interrupting, shouting, and basically being the rude, classless cretins that they are.
Watch Pamela Geller on the Joy Behar Show.avi in News | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Watch Pamela Geller on the Joy Behar Show.avi in News | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Miss Me Yet Billboard of George Bush in Minnesota
This is so funny. I got an e-mail with this on it some time ago, not the billboard, just the picture of George Bush with the words miss me yet. The fact is, I do miss him. I miss his openness and his ability to speak to the American people without condescending or scolding. I miss his cabinet. I miss that I felt safe when he was president. I did not agree with all of his policies but I agreed with the ones that were important to me, particularly his prolife stance. This billboard was erected near Wyoming, Minnesota and so far, no one has found out who did it. I love it!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)